Política de Avaliação
The evaluation of the article, for publication purposes in the Revista de Direito da Amazônia, will be carried out in two stages: preliminary evaluation and reviewers' evaluation. The average evaluation time is 4 months.
Preliminary Evaluation
The first evaluation corresponds to the formatting of the article and the following topics will be evaluated:
- Absence of identification;
- Original/unpublished contribution;
- Article formatting;
- Article structure;
- Compliance with technical standards;
- Correspondence between cited references.
The work may be:
- Approved, it will be eligible for reviewers' evaluation;
- Approved with suggestion for revision/modification, it will return to the authors for necessary modifications and, after corrected, will be forwarded to the reviewers;
- Rejected.
Reviewers' Evaluation
The second evaluation corresponds to the content of the article, which will be carried out via double-blind peer review, where reviewers do not identify the author; therefore, the work must not contain author identification. It is emphasized that the reviewers are external. The following points will be evaluated:
- Title;
- Abstract;
- Introduction;
- Theoretical foundation;
- Method;
- Results and discussion;
- Conclusion;
- References;
- General aspects.
The work may be:
- Approved, it will be eligible for publication;
- Approved with suggestion for alteration, it will return to the authors for necessary modifications and, after corrected, will be forwarded for publication;
- Rejected.
Below are the evaluation forms used in each process:
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION FORM
|
ABSENCE OF IDENTIFICATION |
YES |
NO |
|
Article without any information that identifies the authorship, directly or indirectly; nor mention in the text or in the file properties of the names of the authors, the educational institution, or the advisor, when applicable. |
||
|
ORIGINAL/UNPUBLISHED CONTRIBUTION |
YES |
NO |
|
The article is original and unpublished. |
||
|
ARTICLE FORMATTING |
YES |
NO |
|
The article is in Microsoft Word format, DOC. or DOCX., the text was typed in Times New Roman font, size 12. Obeyed 1.5 line spacing, left and right margins of 3 cm and top and bottom margins of 2 cm, justified alignment, and employs italics instead of underlining (except in URL addresses), presents title, abstract, and keywords in Portuguese and English or another language. |
||
|
ARTICLE STRUCTURE |
YES |
NO |
|
The title in Portuguese is in font 24, Times New Roman, centered, bold, with a maximum of 15 words. The title in another language was inserted right below the title in Portuguese, in the same font, size 16, italics, and centered. |
||
|
The abstract was presented in Portuguese and English or another language with up to a maximum of 250 words. The word Abstract (Resumo) was identified in Times New Roman font, size 12, bold, first letter capitalized. In English or another language, same rules, adding italics. Highlighted the problem, objective, method, and conclusion of the work. |
||
|
The keywords represent the content of the article, being a minimum of 3 (three) and a maximum of 6 (six), separated by semicolons. They are identified in Times New Roman font, size 12. |
||
|
The scientific article contains introduction, topics/development, and conclusion. |
||
|
TECHNICAL STANDARDS |
YES |
NO |
|
Citations and references followed the Standards of the Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas - ABNT, updated version. |
||
|
REFERENCES |
YES |
NO |
|
All references cited in the text appear in the references section |
||
|
PRELIMINARY EVALUATION |
YES |
NO |
|
Does the manuscript comply with all standards established in the preliminary evaluation? |
||
|
Has the manuscript been approved and should it be forwarded to the Evaluation Commission? |
REVIEWERS' EVALUATION FORM
|
TITLE |
YES |
NO |
|
Is it understandable and concise, does it reflect the content? Does it present an adequate English version? |
||
|
ABSTRACT |
YES |
NO |
|
Does it introduce the theme, objectives, methodology, and main results? Does it present an adequate English version? |
||
|
INTRODUCTION |
YES |
NO |
|
Does it present and contextualize the theme, the delimitation of the problem, the justification, the objectives, and the research methodology, as well as the structure of the article? |
||
|
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION |
YES |
NO |
|
Does it present the theory that grounds the study, bringing the main concepts on the theme from the perspective of relevant authors in the area? |
||
|
METHOD |
YES |
NO |
|
Does it present the classification and the research method (including in cases of theoretical research), describing the instruments and procedures adopted in the study? |
||
|
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
YES |
NO |
|
Does it present the main results achieved in the development of the study, bringing systematized data and information that contribute to meeting the proposed objectives? |
||
|
Are the analysis and discussion of data derived from the presented results? |
||
|
CONCLUSION |
YES |
NO |
|
Does it present the main considerations on the study, synthesizing the most relevant aspects of the research, as well as the results obtained? |
||
|
REFERENCES |
YES |
NO |
|
Does it correctly present all references cited in the text? |
||
|
GENERAL ASPECTS |
YES |
NO |
|
Does it present clear language, content organization, and language adequacy? |
||
|
OBSERVATIONS/SUGGESTIONS ON TECHNICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL ASPECTS |
||
